http://www.mmafightgirls.com/post/1731/chris-lebens-next-fight-ufc-82-dan-henderson-vs-anderson-silva-fight-night/ Custom MMA Wallpaper and Hot UFC News Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:25:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 http://www.mmafightgirls.com/post/1731/chris-lebens-next-fight-ufc-82-dan-henderson-vs-anderson-silva-fight-night/#comment-5640 Issac Maez Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:31:06 +0000 http://www.mmafightgirls.com/post/1731/chris-lebens-next-fight-ufc-82-dan-henderson-vs-anderson-silva-fight-night/#comment-5640 UFC is the best althoughto tell the truth I prefer watching the TUF way mor than the normal events, my favourite fighter imo is either Matt Serra or Anderson Silva. UFC is the best althoughto tell the truth I prefer watching the TUF way mor than the normal events, my favourite fighter imo is either Matt Serra or Anderson Silva.

]]> http://www.mmafightgirls.com/post/1731/chris-lebens-next-fight-ufc-82-dan-henderson-vs-anderson-silva-fight-night/#comment-2500 Joel Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:38:50 +0000 http://www.mmafightgirls.com/post/1731/chris-lebens-next-fight-ufc-82-dan-henderson-vs-anderson-silva-fight-night/#comment-2500 You do know Dan Henderson was the champ at 185 in Pride, and that's why he is getting an immediate title shot at Silva? Have you ever seen Rampage fight before he came to the UFC? How can you say Silva will be a harder test, when he is a much better wrestler than Silva, and also throws heavy punches? Silva is for sure a very hard test for Henderson but to say he is a harder test than Rampage doesn't sound very convincing. What's your reasoning behind it? You do know Dan Henderson was the champ at 185 in Pride, and that’s why he is getting an immediate title shot at Silva? Have you ever seen Rampage fight before he came to the UFC? How can you say Silva will be a harder test, when he is a much better wrestler than Silva, and also throws heavy punches? Silva is for sure a very hard test for Henderson but to say he is a harder test than Rampage doesn’t sound very convincing. What’s your reasoning behind it?

]]>